Reimbursing a US company for a seconded employee's salary is not considered a taxable "Fee for Technical Services" (FTS) under the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
04 Jun, 2024
3645 View
The Scenario:
- Juniper Networks Inc., a US company (Assessee), seconded (temporarily assigned) two employees to its Indian subsidiary, Juniper Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (Juniper India).
- The US company paid the salaries of the seconded employees and then received reimbursement from the Indian subsidiary.
- The Indian tax authorities argued that the reimbursement was taxable income for the US company in India under the "Fee for Technical Services" (FTS) provisions of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
The Dispute:
- The Indian tax authorities claimed the reimbursement constituted FTS since the seconded employees provided technical services in India.
- The US company disagreed, arguing the payments were simply reimbursements for salaries they already paid, not a separate service fee.
The Decision:
- The ITAT Bangalore sided with the US company.
- The tribunal held that the reimbursements were not FTS because:
- The seconded employees remained employees of the US company.
- The Indian subsidiary didn't receive any distinct technical expertise beyond the employees' existing skills.
- The reimbursement simply covered pre-existing salary obligations.
Precedence and Reasoning:
- The ITAT referred to a previous case (Goldman Sachs Services Pvt. Ltd.) where similar reimbursements were deemed non-taxable.
- The tribunal emphasized that the key factor is the nature of the arrangement. If it's a simple cost-sharing agreement for existing employees, it's not FTS.
Conclusion:
- This case clarifies the tax treatment of employee reimbursements in secondment arrangements between Indian and US companies under the DTAA.
- Companies involved in such arrangements should carefully analyze the nature of the secondment and ensure proper documentation to support their position in case of tax disputes.
Case-Juniper Networks Inc. versus ITO (International Taxation) Ward 1(2) Bangalore
Comment: