Web Analytics
c9c24acf60bcc3d9c2f14c5b32c23276.jpg

Recovered tax during a search and it's later found to be incorrect, interest won't be paid on the portion that came from the company's prepaid tax credit (Electronic Credit Ledger) balance.

17 Jun, 2024
3525 View

A recent court case where a company (petitioner) in the business of manufacturing and trading ferrous and non-ferrous metals challenged the collection of Integrated GST (IGST) by the government.

 

Background:

  • The petitioner's business was subjected to a search by GST authorities based on suspicion of tax evasion.
  • During the search, authorities demanded a deposit of Rs. 40,06,342/-. This amount included:
    • Rs. 15,06,342/- for alleged stock variation.
    • Rs. 25,00,000/- for alleged wrongful input tax credit (ITC).
  • The petitioner claims the deposit was made under duress at 3:00 AM during the search and without proper opportunity to explain the transactions.

 

Petitioner's Arguments:

  • The deposit wasn't voluntary as it happened during the ongoing search operation and authorities hadn't issued a demand notice.
  • They claim the demand lacked legal basis and violated established procedures.
  • The petitioner cited a court case (Vallabh Textiles vs. Senior Intelligence Officer) where involuntary GST deposits were refunded with interest.

 

Government's Arguments:

  • The government argued the deposit was voluntary and made through the prescribed form (GST DRC-03).
  • They claimed show-cause notices for tax recovery were already underway under Section 73 of the CGST Act.

 

Court's Decision:

  • The court sided with the petitioner, highlighting the following:
    • The timing and circumstances of the deposit (during search operation) indicated coercion.
    • The authorities failed to follow proper procedure as outlined in CBIC Instruction No. 01/2022-2023, which prohibits tax collection during searches.
  • The court ordered the following:
    • Refund of Rs. 15,06,342/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the deposit date.
    • Re-credit of Rs. 25,00,000/- to the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger (without interest as it wasn't claimed earlier).
  • The court clarified that this decision wouldn't affect the ongoing recovery proceedings initiated by the government.

 

Case Law-Sushil Kumar Versus Delhi State GST Govt. NCT of Delhi

Citation-2024 TAXONATION 435 (DELHI)

 

CLICK HERE TO READ FULL CASE LAW 

OR 

SUBSCRIBE GST E-LIBRARY (INDIA'S HIGHEST GST CASE LAW DATA)

FOR MORE UPDATE ON GST/ IT JOIN OUR FREE WHATSAPP GROUP BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK https://chat.whatsapp.com/ILCu7dfsrD07gj5RddywZd

whatsapp Facebook share link LinkedIn share link Twitter share link Email share link

Comment: