Introduction
Case involves the Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited (UPPTCL), which sought clarity on the inclusion of material and execution costs in the taxable value for determining GST liability when only supervision charges are levied.
The Case
UPPTCL is responsible for the transmission of electrical energy in Uttar Pradesh. It also undertakes 'deposit works' at the behest of consumers, which involves adding to or modifying the existing distribution system. The applicant sought an AR on whether the value of materials and execution costs for these works should be included in the taxable value when the applicant charges only supervision fees.
Key Points of the Ruling
Implications
This ruling provides clarity on the GST treatment of supervision charges in a specific context. It emphasizes that only the value of services provided, and not the overall project cost, is subject to GST when the service provider's role is limited to supervision.Businesses providing similar services should carefully analyze their contractual arrangements and the nature of their involvement to determine the correct GST implications.
GST Case Law Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited
Citation-2024 TAXONATION 1668 (UTTAR PRADESH-AAR)
CLICK HERE TO READ FULL CASE LAW
OR
SUBSCRIBE GST E-LIBRARY (INDIA'S HIGHEST GST CASE LAW DATA)
FOR MORE UPDATE ON GST/ IT JOIN OUR FREE WHATSAPP GROUP BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK https://chat.whatsapp.com/C8VB6F6VHme3A061UDQKhj
Comment: