Web Analytics

Penalty proceedings are not attracted where non-mention of the transporter’s name in the e-way bill is a mere technical lapse without any intent to evade tax.

1365 Views

Facts of the Case:

  • Goods were being transported from Delhi to Delhi accompanied by tax invoice, e-way bill, and bilty.

  • The name of the transporter was not mentioned in the e-way bill.

  • Truck number and all other relevant details were mentioned correctly.

  • The goods were detained and seized under Section 129(3) of the CGST/UPGST Act,

  • The adjudicating authority imposed penalty; appellate authority upheld it.

Petitioner's Arguments:

  • Movement was Delhi to Delhi; diversion to Ghaziabad was only for logistical purposes.

  • Invoice, GR, and e-way bill mentioned correct destination.

  • Non-mention of transporter's name in the e-way bill is only a technical breach.

  • No intent to evade tax.

  • Respondent's Arguments:

  • Name of transporter was never disclosed at any stage.

  • Driver's statement about Ghaziabad destination justified proceedings.

  • Authorities acted within law.

Court's Observations:

  • All essential documents (invoice, e-way bill, etc.) were in place except transporter's

  • No finding on intention to evade tax was recorded by lower authorities.

  • Statement of driver alone insufficient to prove evasion.

  • The appellate grounds specifically stating goods were moved for full truck load to godown were never denied by the department.

As per precedents:

  • Varun Beverages Ltd. v. State of U.P. (Allahabad HC)

  • Asst. Commissioner (ST) v. Satyam Shivam Papers (P.) Ltd. (Supreme Court)- penalty under Section 129 is not justified for mere technical lapses without intention to evade tax.

Decision:

  • Penalty proceedings under Section 129 are not attracted without intention to evade./ Both the order dated 30.04.2021 (original authority) and the appellate order dated 23.10.2021 are quashed.

  • Writ petition allowed in favour of the assessee.

GST Case Law Shakuntalam Associates v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-V

Citation-2025 TAXONATION 1946 (ALLAHABAD)(Click here to read full case law)

CA Naredra Gupta

canarendragupta@gmail.com
+91 8800 396 070

SUBSCRIBE GST E-LIBRARY (INDIA'S HIGHEST GST CASE LAW DATA)

FOR MORE UPDATE ON GST/ IT JOIN OUR FREE WHATSAPP GROUP BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK https://chat.whatsapp.com/C8VB6F6VHme3A061UDQKhj

whatsapp Facebook share link LinkedIn share link Twitter share link Email share link